On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:50:55PM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:26:44PM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote: > >>Wywala się (zarówno na sparc i sparc64) > >[...] > >>umount.c:33: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before > >>'umount2' > >>umount.c:33: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'path' > >>umount.c:33: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before > >>'flags' > >>umount.c:33: warning: data definition has no type or storage class > >>umount.c:33: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of '_syscall2' > > > >-#if defined(MNT_FORCE) && !defined(__sparc__) && !defined(__arm__) > >+#if defined(MNT_FORCE) > > > Widziałem, ale to znaczy ze nasz glibc na sparc nie zachowuje sie tak samo > jak ich i bedzie dzialac tia?
To wygląda na jakiś stary workaround na nieaktualne nagłówki na sparcu i armie. <sys/mount.h> w glibc 2.3.6 (także na sparcu) zawiera już to co powinien. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ _______________________________________________ pld-devel-pl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl
