On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:04:25PM +0200, qboosh wrote:
> Author: qboosh Date: Tue Jun 19 20:04:25 2007 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - BR: gd-devel libmagic-devel libpng-devel
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
> mldonkey.spec (1.169 -> 1.170)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/mldonkey.spec
> diff -u SPECS/mldonkey.spec:1.169 SPECS/mldonkey.spec:1.170
> --- SPECS/mldonkey.spec:1.169 Sun Jun 17 01:43:18 2007
> +++ SPECS/mldonkey.spec Tue Jun 19 22:04:20 2007
> @@ -38,14 +38,16 @@
> BuildRequires: autoconf
> BuildRequires: automake
> BuildRequires: bzip2-devel
> -%{?with_gui:BuildRequires: gd-devel}
> +BuildRequires: gd-devel >= 2.0.14
> %{?with_gui:BuildRequires: gtk+2-devel >= 2:2.4.0}
> +BuildRequires: libmagic-devel
> +BuildRequires: libpng-devel
> +%{?with_gui:BuildRequires: librsvg-devel >= 2.0}
> BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel
> BuildRequires: ncurses-devel
> BuildRequires: ocaml-camlp4 >= 1:%{ocaml_ver}
> %{?with_gui:BuildRequires: ocaml-lablgtk2-devel >= 2.6.0}
> %{?with_gui:BuildRequires: ocaml-lablgtk2-rsvg-devel >= 2.6.0}
> -%{?with_gui:BuildRequires: librsvg-devel >= 2.0}
> BuildRequires: cpp
> BuildRequires: perl-base
> %{?with_gui:BuildRequires: pkgconfig}
Nasuwa mi się takie pytanie: czy ocaml-lablgtk2-rsvg-devel nie powinien mieć
Req: librsvg-devel?
--
Szymon Siwek
Los nikomu nie szczędzi rozczarowań
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-pl mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl
