2010/6/12 Patryk Zawadzki <[email protected]>: > 2010/6/12 Bartosz Świątek <[email protected]>: >> Removing this R: breaks the readability of the error and causes >> unnecessary confusion. >> >> I'm afraid glen removes this R: only to get his own comfort using this >> browser on deprecated Ac systems - which are officially not maintained >> by the PLD team. >> >> Removing this R: is (in my eyes) breaking the package on purpose!! > > What you want is BR: %{_libdir}/libjpeg.so.62 so rpm generates the > *proper* Requires.
But after all it's a binary package. Adding such a BR: is more artificial than adding libjpeg6 R:. I agree that both solutions are not optimal - but in the end, it's a binary package - what do we expect? And the motto here is: better be verbose than sorry. -- "I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki _______________________________________________ pld-devel-pl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl
