On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:34:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:16:58PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:59:36PM +0100, undefine wrote:
> > > Module name: SPECS
> > > Changes by: undefine 03/12/17 14:59:34
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > wine.spec
> > >
> > > Log message:
> > > - default build without nas. we don't support nas.. (?)
> > >
> > > Index: wine.spec
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvsroot/SPECS/wine.spec,v
> > > diff -d -u -r1.149 -r1.150
> > > --- wine.spec 9 Dec 2003 15:18:22 -0000 1.149
> > > +++ wine.spec 17 Dec 2003 13:59:33 -0000 1.150
> > > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> > > %bcond_without alsa # don't build ALSA mm driver
> > > %bcond_without arts # don't build aRts mm driver
> > > %bcond_without jack # don't build JACK mm driver
> > > -%bcond_without nas # don't build NAS mm driver
> > > +%bcond_with nas # don't build NAS mm driver
> > > %bcond_without sane # don't build TWAIN DLL with scanning support
> > > (through SANE)
> > > %bcond_without cups # without CUPS printing support in
> > > winspool,wineps DLLs
> > > %bcond_without html_docs # build html docs
> >
> > Znowu zepsuty spec?
> hm?
> nie, z tego co pamietam nie mialo byc nas? a w kazdym razie w ac nie
> ma(?)
jak już, to w ac (ale argumenty za wywaleniem tego byly kiepskie, imho).
więc wtedy na branch ac powinno to pojsc, a nie na head. w nest na razie
nas jest by default.
poza tym o ile pamietam, to mmazur dal sie juz przekonac?
[...]
wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__________________________________________________________
nie pytaj co inni zrobili dla pld, pomysl ile sam zrobiles
