Ramon van Handel wrote: > > Kevin, > > You need to be more strict with AT&T assembly. > I haven't looked at the code yet but I can predict the > sort of mistakes: for instance, Yep, I looked at my code and realized I don't force the compiler to use byte-capable registers for byte operations. No problem, I will add the 'q' constraint, which means byte-capable register, instead of 'r'. Etc. -Kevin
- [plex86] CVS updates: done with emulation of user-level i... Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] CVS updates: done with emulation of use... Jeff Dubrule
- Re: [plex86] CVS updates: done with emulation of... Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] CVS updates: done with emulatio... Ramon van Handel
- [plex86] CVS updates: fixes for 8-bit in... Kevin Lawton
- [plex86] CVS updates: fixes for 8-bit instructio... Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] CVS updates: fixes for 8-bit in... kcarnold
- Re: [plex86] CVS updates: fixes for 8-bi... Kevin Lawton
