Ramon van Handel wrote:
>
> Kevin,
> 
> You need to be more strict with AT&T assembly.
> I haven't looked at the code yet but I can predict the
> sort of mistakes: for instance,

Yep, I looked at my code and realized I don't force
the compiler to use byte-capable registers for
byte operations.  No problem, I will add the
'q' constraint, which means byte-capable register,
instead of 'r'.  Etc.

-Kevin

Reply via email to