On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, James Mastros wrote: > Ahh, now I remember fully what I was thinking with ring0 -> ring1. > > We can make the nexus code ring1 and JMP to it instead of taking an INT3 > into it. This should help preformance. [snip] > Does this help at all? Can the nexus code be ring1 usefuly? Well, I don't see the benefit of using ring1 in stead of ring0. The protection problem remains... > If not, how > about using call gates, are they more efficent then interupt gates? I don't think so... -- Ramon
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement: elminiating ... Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement: elminia... James Mastros
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement: elm... Ramon van Handel
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement:... James Mastros
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement: elminia... Ramon van Handel
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement: elm... Nick Behnken
- RE: [plex86] Performance enhancement:... Drew Northup
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement: elm... Ulrich Weigand
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement:... Ramon van Handel
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancem... James Mastros
- Re: [plex86] Performance enh... Ramon van Handel
- Re: [plex86] Performance... John Summerfield
- Re: [plex86] Performance... Ramon van Handel
- Re: [plex86] Performance... John Summerfield
- Re: [plex86] Performance enh... John Summerfield
- Re: [plex86] Performance enhancement:... Aaron Optimizer Digulla
- RE: [plex86] Performance enhancement:... Drew Northup
- RE: [plex86] Performance enhancem... Bart Oldeman
- RE: [plex86] Performance enh... Drew Northup
- RE: [plex86] Performance... Bart Oldeman
- RE: [plex86] Performance... Drew Northup
