> Actually, I'm not at all sure you are right about Windows either. Last I wrote code for Windows, several programs failed when you turn off swap because you can specifically request storage (IIRC) from the kernel that is "swappable" storage. You could have half a gig of RAM and have programs fail if you turned off swap. It's been a while since I've written anything on that level for win32, so perhaps the semantics have changed, but I'd be leery of stating you can get away without swap without actually trying it. Anyone up for a ten minute trial? Ray
- Re: [plex86] just a thought Luke-Jr
- Re: [plex86] just a thought Elmar Haneke
- Re: [plex86] just a thought Eric Laberge
- RE: [plex86] just a thought Drew Northup
- RE: [plex86] just a thought Bart Oldeman
- RE: [plex86] just a thought Drew Northup
- Re: [plex86] just a thought John Summerfield
- Re: [plex86] just a thought James Mastros
- Re: [plex86] just a thought John Summerfield
- Re: [plex86] just a thought Josh G
- Re: [plex86] just a thought Ray Lee
- Re: [plex86] just a thought Josh G
- RE: [plex86] just a thought Drew Northup
- RE: [plex86] just a thought Drew Northup
- RE: [plex86] just a thought Drew Northup
