>But since no one seems to care... If someone DOES add floating point and >MMX support, then I will make the original work GPL. In that case, if >whoever adds that support also makes their changes GPL, the whole thing >will be GPL. Make sense? Doesn't anyone think it's neat to have the x86 >instruction set, including binary encodings, contained in just 150 or so >lines? I think it is quite cool. What happens if I add the support and I do not GPL it? Instead, I come up with some demands of my own. This could get interesting... We could call it, "Free Software held hostage" or "Arm for a Leg Software."
- [plex86] more DT stuff Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Willow Schlanger
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Willow Schlanger
- RE: [plex86] more DT stuff Nelson Rush
- RE: [plex86] more DT stuff ketilf
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Patrick Mauritz
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Willow Schlanger
- RE: [plex86] more DT stuff Nelson Rush
- RE: [plex86] more DT stuff Nelson Rush
- RE: [plex86] more DT stuff Nelson Rush
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Cam
- RE: [plex86] more DT stuff Nelson Rush
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] more DT stuff Willow Schlanger
- RE: [plex86] more DT stuff Drew Northup
