Frohwalt Egerer wrote:
> <soapbox>
>
> Are you all really sure it is time for another C vs C++ (and later on vs
> Java vs .NET vs Python vs Perl) flamefest?
>
> Please let those who do the work decide which tools they want to use and do
> not distract them. I can hardly stand waiting for Plex86.
>
> </soapbox>
>
+1
+1
+1
+1
Who cares as long as it works let those who want to go write a c++
plex86 and stand on their high horse.
> -- Resuming to mailing list lurk mode.
>
> Froh
>
> P.S.: Great work, Kevin!
>
>
>
>>>>>C++ is an exteremely 'complicated' if you need efficiency. Whereas
>>>>>C has a reasonably constant number of assemby instructions per
>>>>>C instruction (I think it averages around 5), C++ has a greatly
>>>>>
> [...]
>
>
>
>
>
--
www.superlinksoftware.com
www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html
- fix java generics!
