> Hello Casey, > > >> So I must tell you that I find strange that > >> you limit yourself to a > >> processor. I mean Bochs seems more > >> interesting because it can emulate a > >> processor on an unlimited number of machine > >> (you just have to port it). > >> Plex86 can help to run a limited number of > >> OSes (mainly Win and Linux) on > >> the same processor. > >> But probably the most noticeable limit is > >> the processor. As processors > >> change, and Plex86 is stuck to x86 > >> processors, does that mean you'll have > >> to > >> start all over again when the x86 production > >> will be stopped ? If really RISC processors > >> get over CISC ones as it is (was ?) said. > > CB> well plex isnt really a full out emulator, > CB> more like a thin layer to allow guest > CB> operating systems access to the "bare metal" > CB> so to speak. > > I know that, but it's strange nobody answers to my > "bochs seems more interesting" idea. > Maybe I'm completely true and I should subscribe > to a Bochs ML instead :)
Well, bochs isn't more interesting to me. :) Afterall, I only really want to run x86 code on x86, and virtualization is potentially much much faster. Daniel
