On 08/05/2011 09:50 AM, w.p.w wrote:
"People use it to store coordinates, names of places, descriptions of places, etc." would this not tend to suggest that its usage needs better defining and expanding or complementing its usage rather then removing it as not fit ?
There are valid reasons for all ways of using it, and trying to standardise on a single way to use the field is not going to work. So you either have a field that does not have a well-defined meaning, or you need multiple location fields for all different syntax types. My suggestions is to just keep Plone core simple and leave this to specific sites or add-on products that know how they need to use a location field. That also opens up the ability for people to do things like use a geo-index for the location field in sites, making it really useful.
Wichert. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
