On 24 October 2011 11:56, Jean Jordaan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Asko
>
> For the reasons you give, I agree that replacing plone.reload with
> sauna.reload would not be workable.
>
> However I think it's unfortunate that the distinguishing part of the
> name ("plone" vs "sauna") is meaningless. The only thing that you can
> get out of it is that the "plone" one looks more "official" than the
> "sauna" one.
>
> Both packages address the same use case in different ways. What would
> be the best way to convey this in a name? Something like:
>
> plone.reload.addons
> plone.reload.coredev
>
-1 for nesting namespaces and replacing renaming plone.reload, which is in
wide use.
How about plone.autoreload or something like that?
Martin
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
