On 2012-10-13 08:08:13 +0000, David Glick (Plone) said:
On 10/12/12 7:57 PM, Alex Clark wrote:
On 2012-10-12 14:32:44 +0000, Tom Gross said:
There is no automated way. But adding a buildout based on one of these
http://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/buildout/plonetest/
(any reason to not have these on github?)
I am interested in moving them to github (and leaving the old ones in
place with a note) but IIRC davisagli and I didn't agree on what to
call them. I don't like "plonetest" because that is meaningless AFAICT
(or at least, I don't understand what it means. Buildouts for… testing?)
They are in fact buildouts that were created for the purpose of testing
Plone add-ons. Please just leave the name alone; even if it's not a
particularly verbose name, renaming things tends to cause confusion.
WAT?
Sorry, but you can't effectively argue both sides of an issue [1].
Additionally, I don't care. :-) I'll move them to the GitHub collective
as buildout.plonetest ASAP. And I'll assume that when you say "purpose
of testing Plone add-ons" you mean: "buildouts that install plone to
use during add-on development, to write tests for those add-ons" vs.
"buildouts that install plone add-ons". *SHRUG*
Alex
[1] IIRC you recently argued on plone-dev that z3c.jbot should be
renamed… in that case folks argued against it because z3c.jbot was well
known. In this case, not only is "plonetest" not well known, I still
don't know what it is, definitively :-). I assume it's something like:
https://github.com/pythonpackages/buildout-plone. Further, it's not a
Python package so IMHO it's not subject to the same set of criteria
we'd use to evaluate the naming convention. -- What I am really pushing
for, that perhaps I should have been more clear about, is: we currently
have a nice "buildout.python" repo for building all versions of Python.
And it would be nice if we could have a "buildout.plone" repo to do
build all versions of Plone, too. So, if it's true that "plonetest" is
intended to be used as "buildouts for plone" (not just "testing
add-ons") then it really should be called "buildout.plone" IMHO. Or, if
it really is just for "testing add-ons" then maybe it shouldn't be
renamed. Again, *SHRUG*
David
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
--
Alex Clark · https://www.gittip.com/aclark4life/
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
