Great, thanks for taking a stab at this :)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Tommy Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I had some time to revisit the package that I released last year that
> implements OAuth provider support for Plone.  Improvements were made to make
> it safer and friendlier to use.  Safer in the sense that python-oauth2 is
> stripped out and replaced more thoroughly tested, actively
> developed/maintained and RFC5849 conforming oauthlib, with a revamp of the
> scope management and handling that is based on endpoints offered by
> content-types, and done in a way that scope for each access token will not
> mutate with respect to future changes to a given scope identifier.
> Friendlier in the sense that specified scope(s) can be constructed in a way
> so that when they are presented to resource owners, the list of permissions
> to be granted can be understood by them at a glance.  This is especially
> useful in cases where package developers wishing to enable users to export
> their private data; they can create a scope profile permitting the target
> endpoint(s) and inform their clients (consumers) t
> o use the
> m.  Please refer to the 'Using OAuth with scope' section in the
> documentation for details to the revised built-in scope manager.
>
> For more in-depth list of changes, documentation and installation
> instruction, this can be found at:
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pmr2.oauth/0.4
>
> One unfortunate note is that due to the large amount of restructuring and
> wording changes, the translations table graciously provided by giacomos no
> longer applies to this version.
>
> Comments, suggestions and patches are welcomed.
>
> Regards,
> Tommy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Product-Developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers



-- 
Best Regards,

Christian Ledermann

Nairobi - Kenya
Mobile : +254 702978914

<*)))>{

If you save the living environment, the biodiversity that we have left,
you will also automatically save the physical environment, too. But If
you only save the physical environment, you will ultimately lose both.

1) Don’t drive species to extinction

2) Don’t destroy a habitat that species rely on.

3) Don’t change the climate in ways that will result in the above.

}<(((*>
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers

Reply via email to