Is there anything wrong with using readonly from fields with dexterity? Archetypes is fine also but if you can, why not just utilize dexterity. Future plone won't ship by default with archetypes.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bárbara Arena <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > i've been working on a product that consumes webservice data using "Suds". > We have a main script/method to access each webservice, scripts to parse > the results and template pages to show them properly. > We were using archgen + archetypes, but since it is a new product, I > thought using Dexterity would be a good idea. > However, I'm struggling on how to do it right (and if it can/should be > done with Dexetrity now). > The thing is that, unlike the documentation examples, the > types/folders/pages generated by our product dont have any field to be > filled by the enduser, instead, we just need to show the data from the ws. > Should I work with dafault values and readonly fields,or create custom > fields? > Do I insist on Dexterity approach for this or leave it with Archetypes? > Any sugestion? > > Bárbara Winckler Arena > > _______________________________________________ > Product-Developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers > > -- Nathan Van Gheem Solutions Architect Wildcard Corp
_______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
