-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Christian Ledermann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Andreas Jung <[email protected]> > wrote: David Glick (Plone) wrote: >>>> On 10/30/13, 12:17 PM, Héctor Velarde wrote: >>>>> according to our versioning scheme conventions, we should do >>>>> the following: >>>>> >>>>> Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the: >>>>> >>>>> * MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes, * >>>>> MINOR version when you add functionality in a >>>>> backwards-compatible manner, and > This classification is completely nonsense. There had been always > some incompatible changes API wise and import-wise between 4.x > versions. > >> yes that's why this discussion is happening. We can learn from >> previous mistakes ;) Here is the real definition: MAJOR: the next big thing and we intentionally break things in a large way MINOR: we break imports, we are _trying_ to be as compatible as possible PATCH: only bugfixes, no API changes, no new features - -aj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGUBAEBAgAGBQJScf0lAAoJEADcfz7u4AZjflQLv3OpiESzLDLAFfn8U/s8j1KI cr6C8Z3qKR3mWFLJ3byNN/fKDn3X5mQhcSVCeH27bJNNhG5Zra/w9O81hGMU2Jfg Gq7BpVjbrNc2nIEgZDHoKibxoU5PSYJj30N7RzuW4kMSdojEP+hUc/s6DZKM6k1X xPfoi4w3t0KgKOY6XaTa2+p6TOPq+lbzs5hKIOCYvQBIPx0Vf90PBflBqAhU8qjE veK0kK9uJpsOMO4//fuGiPUWzmYiXY7p2nV2leoDidvUcuSRkMTMBHsx0jY2oG67 y52JcgCIijPpwZ+LEsvJsRWw0yTnNEl54xUbBgW5LFILd1Y6ygajAdOWZU8RR5Ud hfMoqfGLWogNzQc4synNyCq2/f2/fbIKCDBozEEyKN/cKeIsnwaRjsBRMIrkqinT mll4YG+09IEM3c3a6wZvq2uK/dnyRu2MyRoqSCPauzVUXkVgEgDcCRI286mNwU/D vqExejcWt21gV7zQ3XwTuCzNrH91d0E= =NtiP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<attachment: lists.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
