Hello,
Am 30.10.2013 18:45, schrieb Luke Brannon:
We are looking at transitioning from ArchGenUML to AGX for development
of dexterity content types. Is anyone using AGX to develop dexterity
products?
Please consider that dexterity generator for AGX is not 100% finished yet
If you are using it, were you able to transition previous UML projects
(archetypes based) to dexterity?
It's not really possible to reuse existing models. First ArchGenXML
models are UML 1.x, which handles stereotypes and tagged values in a
different way than UML 2, which is used by AGX. Second the existing
stereotypes and tagged values of ArchGenXML do not exist in AGX. Thus
everything reuseable left after model migration would be the class
elements and it's attributes, and all relevant stereotypes would need to
be applied again. Also the way models are created for dexterity might
slightly differ from the archetypes ones with dx behaviors in mind. And
finally AGX does not know workflow generation yet.
What is your overall impression of AGX? Many thanks in advance!
well, as one oth the authors i'm sort of prejudiced ;)
Regards,
regards
Luke Brannon
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
