Omitting the field in DX was intentional. See https://github.com/plone/plone.app.contenttypes/issues/30
Am 13.05.2014 um 20:06 schrieb Johannes Raggam <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 11:56 -0300, Héctor Velarde wrote: >> On 13-05-2014 06:42, ajung wrote: >>> I am missing the 'location' field in plone.app.contenttypes or the standard >>> Dexterity behaviors. >>> Was this removed? And why? >> >> HV> Dexterity-based content types have never included the location field >> on the metadata standard behavior. >> >> there was a discussion about fixing this around 2 years ago on the >> Dexterity development group but I can't find it anymore. >> >> yes, it's a problem; yes, we need to fix it; and yes, it should be easy. > > maybe it was just simply forgotten. > > i agree, it would be easy. basically a simple behavior schema with a > location string field, some tests and done. > > > _______________________________________________ > Product-Developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
