Hi
On 10/6/11 5:07 PM, hydrostarr2 wrote:
bump. Thoughts?
Excessive prodding is not likely to solicit the response you desire.
It's OK to follow up your own post with additional thoughts, but please
don't assume that because no one answers they haven't read your
question. Rather, it's just like IRC chat support: if someone can
answer, they will. There is no need to repeat questions or otherwise try
to coerce members in to answering ;-).
Alex
Would like to get this settled soon... getting close and
closer to "production release day." (Thx for any help.)
Am considering amending proposed approach, and only changing to
'plone:plone' for /usr/local/Plone/zeocluster/* (and NOT
/usr/local/Plone/zeocluster).
Further, if it hasn't yet been noted: user/group ownership change was needed
in at last one of our system installs in order for plone-based process to
update/write/whatever properly in one of the /usr/local/Plone/zeocluster/var
areas...fwiw.
hydrostarr2 wrote:
Any thoughts?
hydrostarr2 wrote:
Any general "best practice" recommendations for user/group ownership (in
Ubuntu 10/11) of /usr/local/Plone and all its dirs/files in its tree?
We've been running with inconsistent settings, and plan to standard on
all 'plone:plone' for /everything/ in /usr/local/Plone. eg:
Problems with this? Alternative suggestions (and if so, why?)?
--
View this message in context:
http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/User-group-ownership-all-plone-plone-tp6860860p6867398.html
Sent from the Installation, Setup, Upgrades mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Alex Clark ยท http://aclark.net
_______________________________________________
Setup mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-setup
