On 2007-05-21 00:34-0400 Jim Dishaw wrote:

> "Alan W. Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> My own feeling is we should do at least one more development release,
>> 5.7.4, ... and a new windows device driver (Jim Dishaw).
>>
>
> I defintely concur about having one more developmental release.  I will
> not have the windows driver "release quality" until late August.
> I'm in the midst of finishing my dissertation and preparing for my
> defense and the only work I do on plplot is to add a necessary feature
> (you should see the debugging messages spewing out of the new driver...).
>
> So, I would prefer that the new windows driver makes it debut in a
> developmental version rather than a stable release.

Jim, thanks for that update on the current experimental status of your
windows device driver and also your currently severe time constraints.

I should mention that your project as well as the rest of those that I
listed are all in the "would-be-nice" category, and I don't think we should
delay the proposed 5.7.4 and 5.8.0 releases for any of them.  The reason why
I feel this way is we have done a lot of work in the current series of
development releases, and it would be nice to make that work available as a
stable release as soon as possible so the conservative subset of our users
that wait for stable releases will benefit from our work sooner rather than
later. The only reason why I think we need one more development release
before that stable release is to to get any kinks out of the release scripts
and procedures caused by our conversion to subversion.  Of course, depending
on Hazen's time constraints that delay in the stable release might give any
of the projects I mentioned (including your own) a chance to get into the
last development release before the stable release.

Note, your code does not have to be perfect to get into PLplot.  I expect,
instead, that Werner, Arjen, and Andrew (the core developers in a position
to evaluate a windows device) will instead just want to make sure your
windows device has some unique potential that does not exist in current
windows devices.  Once that uniqueness test is passed, I presume they would
be willing to commit experimental device code donated by you with the device
turned off by default so the experimental code only builds if specifically
requested by the user. (Note, that is how I am treating Jerry Bauck's
experimental Ada interface code that he has been working on recently.) But
if you decide to contribute your code for evaluation by our core windows
developers after 5.8.0, that is fine as well.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation
for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software
package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of
Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project
(lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to