On Jul 2, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: >> >> Of course the thin binding will still have to be accessed with the >> "with PLplot_Thin" clause. > > Of course, that's true for the code in the thick and traditional > bindings, > but does Ada demand such a clause in the examples once all > references to the > thin binding are completely eliminated from the examples? (Just > curious > about the answer here. I would like to eliminate the clause if Ada > does not > require it, but if for some reason Ada does require it in our > examples, then > I can live with it.)
No--once I get the constants and a few type and procedure declarations copied into the thick and traditional bindings, the examples and all user programs will no longer to mention PLplot_Thin. Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
