Andrew Ross wrote: >Arjen, > >I guess this is an issue with gcc 3.4.4 being tighter with type >checking. No-one else has yet reported it. I assume the problem is that >the compiler doesn't know whether to interpret 1 as a PLINT or a bool. >To my mind it is definitely an int. (bool should either be true or >false). Anyway, the C++ example now uses true rather than 1 in the call >plshades. Does this fix your problem? > > > Hi Andrew,
the change to "true" did indeed do the trick - g++/gcc is now perfectly happy to compile the example. Regards, Arjen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
