On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Werner Smekal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would actually propose to drop the plrandi() function and only use the > plrandd() function, since a double should be available in all languages, or? > If you need an integer, you need to multiply the double with the max value > of your range.
I like this approach. I think a float-based random number function is much more useful than one that is integer based. It is one less non-plotting function to maintain in the library, and in this case it seems that a few of the language bindings would be simpler as a result. Hez -- Hezekiah M. Carty Graduate Research Assistant University of Maryland Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
