> On 2008-08-01 22:24+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > I also noticed the integer(16) and did not like it since in fortran 77 at > least integer*8 would correspond to 64 bits and integer*16 to 128 bits. > Arjen, do you know about this? > >> Can you test again with my fix and see what happens? > > The f95 example build errors are gone now. Also, the resulting C and f95 > results agree exactly now. So your change appears to be a good fix > for the 64-bit problem I found. >
KIND numbers in Fortran 95 do not have to indicate the number of bytes (despite the fact that many compilers do use that number to indicate the KIND). I am not sure why you get a kind 16 - I will have to look into that, but I suspect that the way to generate the KIND number in CMakeLists.txt is not quite correct (or there is a problem in the compiler). I will look into this one. Regards, Arjen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
