On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Werner Smekal<sme...@iap.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > On the other side your test case is rather specific. You are using a > bleeding edge distribution - I read about this distribution of Fedora > and it was called genius (because everything is so new) and totally > crazy (because everything is so new ;). Using Fedora Core 11 will > likely lead to problems. You are using your own tcl/tk libraries > (which should work, but is special) and you're are obviously using a > 64bit machine - also not well tested (though Alan and Andrew use such > a system). So I would think for sure, that not everything will run > perfect on such an environment.
Just for a bit of clarification, PLplot's Subversion head does compile on my 64bit Fedora 11 install. I have tested and used it here. This is using Fedora-provided binaries for everything except PLplot itself and OCaml (for the OCaml bindings), so I can not comment on the effect of using user-provided alternate library versions. I don't want any (potential) Fedora users out there to get the wrong impression about PLplot's function in their distribution :-) For example, Fedora seems to have some of the most complete PLplot binary packaging available in a Linux distribution. Hez -- Hezekiah M. Carty Graduate Research Assistant University of Maryland Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
