Hi Andrew,
I had forgotten about that function. Yes, we can use it. The
documentation is pretty clear about its use.
Regards,
Arjen
On 2009-08-25 15:23, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:20:29PM +0200, Arjen Markus wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> I looked at the source code for the bindings and I realised that
>> currently we do not use tcl_precision or something similar to _return_
>> values from PLplot routines. Instead we simply use %f to format the
>> returned number. Up to now that was satisfactory, but the time functions
>> return data with high precision.
>>
>> As a temporary workaround, could you try with a format like %.20f -
>> like:
>>
>> Line 283, 284 in pltclgen.tcl:
>> "PLFLT& {
>> puts $GENFILE " sprintf( buf, \"%.20f\", $argname($i) );"
>>
>> (I seem to have added all manner of comments about it - never got around
>> to actually implement them. It was not pressing then. I will be glad
>> to take care of it myself, once I can comfortably access my computer
>> at home again)
>
> Arjen,
>
> Rather than using sprintf, is there any reason we can't use the
> Tcl_PrintDouble function which will handle tcl_precision for us anyway?
>
> Andrew
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
