Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Here are some timing results for example 17 for various interactive devices.
> 
> softw...@raven> time ./x17c -dev xwin
> 
> real    0m10.224s
> user    0m0.096s
> sys     0m0.040s
> 
> softw...@raven> time ./x17c -dev qtwidget
> 
> real    0m11.521s
> user    0m1.084s
> sys     0m0.080s
> 
> softw...@raven> time ./x17c -dev wxwidgets
> 
> real    0m12.655s
> user    0m0.944s
> sys     0m0.160s
> 
> softw...@raven> time ./x17c -dev xcairo
> 
> real    1m19.804s
> user    0m1.376s
> sys     0m2.852s
> 
> So xcairo is roughly 7x slower than the others which is really noticeable
> when running "make test_interactive" in either the build tree (with
> BUILD_TEST=ON) or the installed examples tree.
> 
> Could one of those interested in the cairo device driver please put this
> interactive speed issue on their ToDo list?

Could you elaborate a bit on these numbers? I also get about 10sec for 
xwin, but xcairo only takes 15sec which is not much slower.

Version info:
pkg-config --modversion pangocairo
1.22.2
pkg-config --modversion pango
1.22.2
pkg-config --modversion cairo
1.8.0

-Hazen


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to