On Feb 18, 2010, at 9:14 , Alan W. Irwin wrote: > I left out your other questions because I am confused on those > issues as > well. However, assuming you get them figured out, I would > appreciate it if > you took some additional time to update the relevant docbook > documentation > to help relieve everybody's confusion on these matters.
I'll take a crack at it if/when I get to an appropriate level of understanding. > I can help you out a bit with this one. There is an example of how > "defined" is used in the C version of example 16. And, FWIW, I > think we > should have adopted a more general API for "defined". However, I > guess > nobody cares too much about it because of its limitations. For > example, the > "defined" part of example 16 looks pretty good at normal > resolution, but you > get a real mess at lower resolutions. Thanks for the pointer. Just to make this more searchable in the archives, use of plshade's "defined" feature is only demonstrated when giving x16c the "-exclude" option. Compare the output of these two commands... x16c -dev xwin -exclude x16c -dev xwin -exclude -nx 10 -ny 10 > Thus, I don't think there is any > language interface that currently propagates what C does with > "defined", Actually, the ocaml bindings seem to support this concept. > and > I suggest you skip it for Ruby as well. Too late! :-) I've already borrowed from the approach taken in the ocaml bindings. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
