On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alan W. Irwin <ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca> wrote: > On 2010-05-01 14:43-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > >> Alan, >> >> Thank you for looking in to this. My reason for making that change >> was that it doesn't make sense to me in a general context to require >> that both arguments are non-NULL - if the pltr function does not >> require any extra data to be passed in then it seems strange to >> require a non-NULL pltr_data argument. This holds for any language. > > The Python and Tcl issues are now solved, and the pltr_data tests are now > dropped as of revision 10965. Your clear argument for dropping the > pltr_data tests was an excellent motivator to deal with these issues. >
Alan, Thank you very much for tracking down and fixing these issues! As per our off-list discussion, I just got the Python and Tcl bindings building on my system so I will hopefully be able to be more proactive about at least identifying issues like this in the future. Hez ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
