On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Alan W. Irwin
> <ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca> wrote:
> >> I gave the change a shot. ??I don't want to commit without getting some
> >> feedback, so I have attached a test patch for pllegend.c and x04c.c
> >> for your consideration. ??I think the result is positive overall.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > I looked at the patch to make sure I had understood you before. ??(I
> > had.) Note in the example I just posted, the exact same number of
> > quantities are specified as in your patch to x04c.c, but with a
> > uniform index of 0 for the data for the first legend entry and a
> > uniform index of 1 for the data for the second legend entry. ??Sorry,
> > but I just feel that uniform indices are much easier for humans to
> > understand so I would like to stick with the status quo.
> >
> 
> Thanks for the quick respons!  Those are all valid points, and given
> those I'm happy to stick with the current implementation.

I think I agree with Alan on this one. 

Andrew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to