On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Alan W. Irwin > <ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca> wrote: > >> I gave the change a shot. ??I don't want to commit without getting some > >> feedback, so I have attached a test patch for pllegend.c and x04c.c > >> for your consideration. ??I think the result is positive overall. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > I looked at the patch to make sure I had understood you before. ??(I > > had.) Note in the example I just posted, the exact same number of > > quantities are specified as in your patch to x04c.c, but with a > > uniform index of 0 for the data for the first legend entry and a > > uniform index of 1 for the data for the second legend entry. ??Sorry, > > but I just feel that uniform indices are much easier for humans to > > understand so I would like to stick with the status quo. > > > > Thanks for the quick respons! Those are all valid points, and given > those I'm happy to stick with the current implementation.
I think I agree with Alan on this one. Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
