HI andrew, On 2012-09-27 13:35, Andrew Ross wrote: > There are such libraries (Phil mentioned one). We could use these, it > just introduces another dependency on the core of plplot for what is > a relatively minor feature. Currently the plplot core and some basic > drivers can be compiled with almost no dependencies. For testing, > porting to new systems and potentially embedded systems this is a very > useful thing and worth preserving. > > Of course we could keep the current code as well and only enable > shapefile support if the library is present. Shapefile support would > be convenient for users. >
Actually, that is what I had in mind. Regards, Arjen DISCLAIMER: This message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and destroy this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. The foundation 'Stichting Deltares', which has its seat at Delft, The Netherlands, Commercial Registration Number 41146461, is not liable in any way whatsoever for consequences and/or damages resulting from the improper, incomplete and untimely dispatch, receipt and/or content of this e-mail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
