On 2014-04-08 10:45+0200 Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Hi Alan! > [Alan said:] >> Thorsten (or anybody else here) if you do have access to a D compiler >> on Windows and want to look further into D language support on that >> platform, I would encourage you to experiment with Windows-only >> changes to our D language support files (using -DENABLE_d=ON), but >> otherwise I don't think it is possible to figure out what changes are >> needed in those files for the Windows case. > > I will give this a try today. According to the CMakeDInformation two > compilers seem of interest, DMD and GDC. Because the erroneous linker flag > is in the non-GDC branch, I will do my tests using DMD.
That would be great. By the way, I agree with you the present logic for setting general non-D variables (that affect all compilers) such as CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH_FLAG, CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH_FLAG, and CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH_TERMINATOR cannot be correct. The present overall logic for doing that is IF(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GDC # Set D-related variables [...] # Set general variables [...] ELSE(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GDC) IF(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} STREQUAL "Windows") # Set D-related variables [...] # Set general variables [...] ELSE(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} STREQUAL "Windows") # Set D-related variables [...] # Set general variables [...] ENDIF(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} STREQUAL "Windows") ENDIF(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GDC) One of the problem (as I see it) is that ELSE(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GDC) clause which means every compiler is affected (as you found out) by whatever is set for the general variables for the non-GDC case. I would suggest replacing that clause by ELSEIF(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_DMD) as an experiment to see whether that stops the cross-talk with the other compilers. Of course, that change has nothing to do with the variables that need to be set to get DMD to work in the Windows case so additional experiments will likely be required to get that working. By the way, I don't think the DMD compiler support has been tested on any platform yet. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_(programming_language), DMD is not completely open source software. Thus, Debian (and presumably most other Linux distributions) aren't allowed to distribute it. So all our testing so far of the D binding for PLplot has been done with GDC. Also, I don't think GDC has been tested on the Windows platform so if you get a chance to do such testing as well as the DMD testing you have planned, that would be great. Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Put Bad Developers to Shame Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud. http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel