Hi Alan,

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]

> So in the Windows case the code is executing exactly as designed, but if you 
> are concerned about the possible inconsistency that can result if you use the 
> wrong PATH as in case 2 above, then you could redesign the Windows (including 
> Cygwin) implementation so that it also prepended the correct build-tree or 
> install-tree path to the device driver name.  I would think such an 
> implementation would be straightforward for you to do if you felt it was a 
> priority, but it would require build-tree and install-tree testing for the 
> Cygwin, pure MinGW, MinGW/MSYS, and MSVC cases to make sure that 
> implementation was correct.  (I separate the pure MinGW and MinGW/MSYS cases 
> because the paths are treated differently in those two cases.)

Inconsistency would arise if someone has different data files in the build-tree 
and in the install-tree. I do not think it is really worth the effort.

> Finally, for the present PATH method I have good pure MinGW results and you 
> have good Cygwin results, but when convenient (i.e. whenever we are doing 
> other tests on the indicated platform) we should both probably extend that 
> testing (tests 1 and 3 above) to all other Windows platforms accessible to us 
> (MinGW/MSYS in my case and pure MinGW, MinGW/MSYS, and MSVC in your case).

Hm, especially the MSVC case does require testing. I will have a look at that, 
but my time is rather limited this week, if I look at my agenda (and I will be 
abroad next week, which also limits the time I can spend). I will try anyway to 
test the MSVC case.

Regards,

Arjen
DISCLAIMER: This message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended 
recipient please notify the sender immediately and destroy this message. 
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. 
The foundation 'Stichting Deltares', which has its seat at Delft, The 
Netherlands, Commercial Registration Number 41146461, is not liable in any way 
whatsoever for consequences and/or damages resulting from the improper, 
incomplete and untimely dispatch, receipt and/or content of this e-mail.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The best possible search technologies are now affordable for all companies.
Download your FREE open source Enterprise Search Engine today!
Our experts will assist you in its installation for $59/mo, no commitment.
Test it for FREE on our Cloud platform anytime!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=145328191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to