On 2015-08-25 08:15+0100 Phil Rosenberg wrote:

> Hi Alan
>
>> Instead of multiplying the MM values by 72/25.4 within drivers like
>> svg whose length units are pts, I intend instead to simply #define
>> PLPLOT_DEFAULT_PTPI, PLPLOT_DEFAULT_WIDTH_PT, and
>> PLPLOT_DEFAULT_HEIGHT_PT in plplotP.h and use those values in pt devices.
>
> Works for me, I have no strong feelings here.
>
>>
>> It is also becoming pretty clear to me that plsc->xdpi and plsc->ydpi
>> are misnomers since dots per inch normally would refer to pixels only.
>> Thus, I will probably change those to plsc->xupi and plsc->yupi where
>> "upi" stands for units per inch where units could be pixels, pts, mm,
>> or whatever length unit is appropriate to the device.
>
> In the documentation it says that dpi will only be used by raster
> drivers and drivers which use real world units will ignore the dpi
> measurements. I don't know if svg or ps or pdf drivers actually use
> the dpi value at all, but given that statement in the docs then
> leaving it as dpi or using ppi might be a better description.
> In the API these variables are called xp and yp, which are not very
> descriptive This is somewhere it might be worth making a change, where
> I would suggest changing them to dpi or ppi.

Hi Phil:

Actually, that remark about dpi being ignored by "real-world" drivers
is something you included in your recent changes to the plspage
documentation which was probably based on an earlier e-mail remark by
me.  I am not sure this is actually true at the moment for our
"real-world" drivers, but I certainly believe it is a worthwhile goal
for them since changing the number of mm per inch or pts per inch
should do very little other than to cause mass confusion.

At the same time, though, I see nothing wrong with real-world devices
calling plspage with the units per inch that they use so that
plsc->xupi and plsc->yupi will reflect that in case those values are
of some use to the user. Therefore, I am still leaning strongly toward
the above rename from dpi to upi.

Also, I plan to change

PLPLOT_DEFAULT_MMPI ==> PLPLOT_MMPI
PLPLOT_DEFAULT_PTPI ==> PLPLOT_PTPI

(i.e., drop DEFAULT from the name) since there is nothing "default"
about these values).  But I will retain the

PLPLOT_DEFAULT_PIXPI

name since that really is a default value that is only adopted if the
user does not select some other value.

Finally, I have to say that making all devices follow the same set of
rules for getting and setting upi and length values (with
well-established variations for each general kind of device length
unit) is long overdue, and we are still very early in the stages of
the whole process.  So our current ideas about what the rules should
be are mostly theoretical and will likely require revision as we gain
practical experience with this change for more and more of our
devices.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to