Werner,

Thank you for your suggestion. I started off porting something like
wxPLplotstream.cpp to python, as you suggested. I had some quick
success with it so I am now working on a python class more like
wxPLplotwindow.cpp. It all seems to be working well, and I can even
use multiple streams to handle multiple plots simultaneously. Once I
get it in decent shape I will post it here.

I did need to make a couple of changes to plplotcapi.i so swig would
wrap pl_cmd() and PLESC_DEVINIT, since there were not part of the
bindings. Is there a chance that these could be exposed in the python
bindings in the next release of plplot? I saw some problem with the
void* in pl_cmd() while trying to recompile all the bindings, but it
is OK with python. I don't know enough about swig or the other
languages to fix the problem there.

I don't have a quantitative comparison yet, but it looks like plplot
is quite fast compared to the other options I have found for wxPython.

Thanks again,
Brian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Plplot-general mailing list
Plplot-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-general

Reply via email to