Jon Rafkind skrev:
> (define (+1 x) x)
readline::57: define: bad syntax (not an identifier for procedure name,
and not a nested procedure form) at: 1 in: (define (1 x) x)
> (define (-1 x) x)
readline::75: define: bad syntax (not an identifier for procedure name,
and not a nested procedure form) at: -1 in: (define (-1 x) x)
I guess +1 and -1 are parsed as numbers, which aren't included as
identifiers. Is this fixable?
You could use |+1| but pretty it isn't.
--
Jens Axel Søgaard
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
