On May 5, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
If anyone has any comments on the way the Introduction of the below
document refers to PLT, HtDP, or SICP, please let me know.
http://www.neilvandyke.org/sicp-plt/
Perfect.
I'm especially wondering where people using DrScheme for SICP
should be directed for support questions. I think that, by
default, some people will end up emailing their questions to the
"plt-scheme" list or to me, unless the documentation strongly
directs those people elsewhere.
I think we should direct people to plt-scheme for general Scheme
questions and questions concerning the package (and its faithfulness
to SICP). That way you don't have to answer everything.
For SICP content question, they should, well, I don't know. MIT has
killed SICP and Scheme (kill-scheme-kill).
I will also bounce the text off SICP people, once the software has
been tested and is ready for them to look at.
They may wish to say whether they have a take on HtDP vs SICP. Of
course they may not care anymore; Hal's all Python now. And they may
never have read HtDP and/or the article.
-- Matthias
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
