How about the coverage bug (point 2, below)?
On May 11, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
I didn't fix anything, so I'm cc'ing plt-dev in case the person who
did is there.
Robby
On Sunday, May 10, 2009, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu>
wrote:
Correct. It went away with an update. (I had thursday's drscheme
running.)
BUT, now I am getting this
[:~/svn/2HtDP/SampleCode] matthias% (display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
(display-reason #<unequal> #t #f)
in the console from where I launched drscheme.
AND, I am getting the names of the functions colored as if they
hadn't been run, even though my test cases provide complete coverage.
On May 10, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I just tried to look into this, but the program you sent (when
running
in BSL + universe.ss with a build from a few hours ago) does not
trigger the bug for me.
Robby
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
