On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > The structure patterns in scheme/match have always bugged me that they > didn't let you put the fields in any order and you had to put in _ for > the fields you didn't care about.
It would be nice to be able to use the field name as a pattern, which I don't think your system does. So I could write: (define-struct foo (left right)) (match (make-foo 'a 'b) [(struct* foo (right left)) (cons right left)]) N. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
