On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 10:43 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote: > We call it list*. >
Missed that... thanks! However, can't understand why list* when cons* seems a better name. > Carl Eastlund > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Paulo J. Matos<pocma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I make some regular use of cons*. However, I always need to require it > > from srfi/1. Is there any reason why it's not included in the scheme > > language? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Paulo Matos > > > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
