On Jan 31, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
> > Yes -- as long as everything else moves out with it. (Image and
> > posn stuff, r5rs, stepper/debugger language-interface.) Wouldn't
> > this break a lot of existing stuff?
>
> Yeah, probably too much work.
I'm fine with making sure that everything works, that won't be hard.
The only thing I can't deal with easily is knowing how much stuff
outside of the tree may break as a result. If the answer is "not
much" (like really old uses of lang/r5rs) then that would be fine.
> So maybe we need a new collection "lang-line" or something like
> that.
(Ugh...)
On Jan 31, Robby Findler wrote:
> Oh -- and the code that helps you build a #lang reader out of some
> other reader should probably go together with these utilities you're
> thinking about too, right?
You mean "collects/syntax/module-reader.ss" -- yes, that would be
there also. (And since it's only these two, I'd rather see a good
collection name for them...)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
