At Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:12:07 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Robby Findler > <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I like short extensions. So I prefer .rkt over .racket. But I won't > >> fork if we go with something else :P > > > > What would compiled files be? .zo? .racketc? .rckt? ;) > > I think just keeping .zo is the best idea here.
I agree. Along similar lines, I think the Racket C interface should still have "scheme_" prefixes everywhere to avoid transition headaches. (The Cocoa API similarly has "NS" prefixes everywhere.) It seems ok to have historical artifacts at that level. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
