I appreciate the addition of sets to PLT datatypes, but the implementation just added to the trunk is very specific to immutable, hash table-based sets. In the spirit of scheme/dict, which allows for a variety of more interesting dictionary representations, can we leave scheme/set open to other representations of sets?
Carl Eastlund _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
