On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Carl Eastlund <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Again: I'm not going to stand in the way of anyone who wants to make >> the `scheme/set' library more generalizable and extensible. But please >> don't take away `make-set'. > > Now I agree.
...I almost agree. I changed the constructors to "set", "seteq", and "seteqv" on the trunk, so that (set 1 2 3) would look more like (list 1 2 3) and (vector 1 2 3). --Carl _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
