All good here!
-- Dave
On 10 Mar 2010, at 19:05, Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Dave Gurnell
<[email protected]> wrote:
Here's a first attempt at this.
I've added a "~?" wildcard, so named because:
- all letters with the exception of ~g, ~o, and ~q are already used
in
date->string;
- ~g, ~o and ~q seemed inappropriate (although adding my own
initial to the
library was momentarily attractive);
- ~? implies an appropriate uncertainty about the number of digits
in the
year.
Not sure whether I've edited the right file for the
documentation... presumably the SRFI pages are standard across all
implementations. Could use some feedback on that.
I think what you did is fine.
I'll wait until after the next release (Eli just sent the message) and
commit, if there are no objections, is that okay for you?
Jay
I've also realised that none of the ~y, ~Y or ~? wildcards will
recognise
negative years. Not sure if this is a bug - I can correct this too
if need
be.
I've attached the following files in a ZIP archive:
complete source of $PLTHOME/collects/srfi/19/time.ss
complete source of $PLTHOME/collects/tests/srfi/19/tests.ss
complete source of $PLTHOME/doc/srfi-std/srfi-19.html
output from "svn diff"
Comments and corrections welcome.
Cheers,
-- Dave
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
--
Jay McCarthy <[email protected]>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://teammccarthy.org/jay
"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
