On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > At Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:30:57 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: >> Does it make sense to give this revision to define-struct a different >> name and keep the same old define-struct around from scheme/base? > > Lots of other forms and procedures have `struct' in the name, so if we > just change `struct' to something else, we'd either have a mismatch or > have many other changes. > > Or did you have a different kind of change in mind?
I think I must be missing something. I have understood the define-struct changes to be ones that would be compatible with the original define-struct, but to have more features & a better syntax. Is that not right? Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
