Please revive it Eli. Put it in unstable or something. I will write documentation for it if necessary. I think it's a great thing.
Jay On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 15, Noel Welsh wrote: >> I agitated for something along these lines some time ago. To be >> honest I can never remember the object syntax and I much prefer >> scheme/dict style dispatch to (send ...) I also think such an OO >> system has the nice property of using the module system as a module >> system rather than using class for said purpose. Eli knocked out a >> little OO system along these lines and I then dropped the ball. > > (It wasn't really an OO system -- it was more like an organized way to > define such property-based methods. (I didn't think it through, so > perhaps there is an OO system at the end of that.) I can resurrect > the code, probably. IIRC, it was close to workable.) > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev > -- Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://teammccarthy.org/jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
