You're seeing a bug in Planet's version comparisons -- it doesn't know how to compare 5.x to 4.x, so planet packages that require some 4.x minimum version don't work in 5.x. As a result you'll (currently) only be able to get versions of a package that require 3xx or have no requirements at all. Robby and Eli are working on it; once they put in a fix, it should be smooth sailing.
Carl Eastlund On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Doug Williams <m.douglas.willi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had assumed that the transition to V5 would be rather smooth for PLaneT > packages, but - at least in my case - they aren't. [If these are answered > elsewhere, just point me to it.] > > Should V4 PLaneT files generally load under V5 (i.e., is my experience an > anomaly)? > > If not, what are the expectations in migrating PLaneT packages from V4 to > V5? > > Why do I get "require: PLaneT could not find the requested package: Server > had no matching package: There are packages matching the criteria, but none > match your version of PLT Scheme in: (planet > williams/table-panel/tabel-panel)" with some of my packages? > > Why does requiring the science collection (planet williams/science/science) > load version 2.9 instead of the latest (3.10)? Did the method for specifying > the repository, etc change? > > Building the science collection .plt file now crashes with "PLaneT packager: > Error generating scribble documentation: procedure collect method in > ...bble/html-render.rkt:1282:2: expects 3 arguments, given 2: '(#<part>) > '(#<path:planet-docs/science>)". Any idea what causes this? [It does use > subcollections.] > > There will likely be more to follow? > > Doug _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
