On Jun 9, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Eric Tanter <etanter at dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:
>> Yes, Carl got my point right. And yes, that's like showing square brackets
>> in the stepper ;)
>
> Right now, the two cases are slightly asymmetric, since there's a
> syntax property indicating the use of [] or {}, but none indicating
> the use of ', #', #`, etc. Similarly there's no syntax property
> indicating the difference between (a b) and (a . (b)) (something I
> once tried to fix, but gave up on).
Wait... what!?
I had no idea. Well, that's *great* news!
Next question: is there a way to push this through pretty-print? I looked for
a mechanism in the docs, but didn't find one.
Perhaps the stepper should just forget about using pretty-print. Is the
editor's indentation machinery exposed in a way that could be used by the
stepper?
John
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4669 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20100609/badb04d4/attachment.p7s>
