On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> Absolutely. Let's make sure not to reinvent the wheel in a new
> language every 4 months though. Ideally, we should sit down "virtually" and
> have a parser architecture discussion, and make all the parts similar, so
> updating one will make sense in how to update the others, to keep them all
> in sync.
Sounds good. I've been poking at writing a new Perl parser off and on for
the past while (not much progress yet), and it would be supremely useful
if we could come up with a good architecture that can be implemented in
multiple languages -- or in one (probably C) with bindings for other
languages.
-dave0
--
aitchteeteepeecolonslashslashtripledoubleyoudotevilplotdotorgslashtildedave
"Not much call for a barbarian hairdresser, I expect. I mean, no-one
wants a shampoo-and-beheading" -- ``Sourcery'', Terry Pratchett
